It feels wrong to me to file issues with infra to delete other people's projects...

Its a duplicate project and @computerkid doesn't have the time to manage the podcast/live streams for Fedora.

@itguyeric can you please point us to the original repository or are you folks planning to move over to GitLab (w.r.t. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11228)?

Planning to move to GitLab with the rest of the marketing team.=20

But for reference:
https://pagure.io/fedora-podcast

On Apr 10, 2023, at 03:40, Akashdeep Dhar pagure@pagure.io wrote:
=20
=EF=BB=BF
t0xic0der added a new comment to an issue you are following:
@itguyeric can you please point us to the original repository or are you f= olks planning to move over to GitLab (w.r.t. https://pagure.io/fedora-infras= tructure/issue/11228)?
=20
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11229

I'm not a fan of removing this without an ack from @computerkid - I might be convinced to put a note on it that the livestreams are currently inactive, but I'd prefer Grayson to ack deleting it.

@nb +1. Until we hear back from @computerkid, the most we can (or should) do is put a deprecated status on that repository info.

@itguyeric Consider migrating the issue tickets with the original information about its creators to preserve the historical context. Good luck with the much-needed Fedora Podcast refresh!

Going to close this one as WONTFIX.

If @computerkid wants this repo deleted, that is something that @computerkid can do from the repo settings.