fedora-kde / SIG

#486 Should kwallet recommend/require signon-kwallet-extension?
Closed: Won't fix by siosm. Opened by siosm.

Closed: Won't fix
Reopen Issue

While reviewing comps-update (https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/945), I've found that we have signon-kwallet-extension and that kwallet does not depend on it. Should it? Should we include that in Kinoite?

It's already a rich reverse dependency: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/signon-kwallet-extension/blob/rawhide/f/signon-kwallet-extension.spec#_25

I'd say that kaccounts-integration should depend on signon-kwallet-extension.

signon-kwallet-extension bridges the accounts stack to kwallet, if the accounts stuff is not there then there's no use for signon-kwallet-extension

It's already a rich reverse dependency: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/signon-kwallet-extension/blob/rawhide/f/signon-kwallet-extension.spec#_25

Ah indeed. I was looking at F39 and we don't have that there.

Metadata Update from @siosm:
- Issue untagged with: kinoite

It's pulled in via signon with the dependency in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kaccounts-integration/blob/rawhide/f/kaccounts-integration.spec#_52

So I guess it works right now and is pulled in as a dependency so let's keep things as is for now.

Metadata Update from @siosm:
- Issue close_status updated to: Won't fix
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
Metadata
None

packaging

None
None
None
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.