FESCo approved a requirement that Spin/Labs owners be sent keepalive request in order to keep building the spin or lab. Please confirm that you want Scientific Spin to continue for Fedora 32.
@amitksaha
Ping @amitksaha
@amitksaha isn't too active nowadays. I've just e-mailed the mailing list to ask what should be done about this. Sorry for the delay.
I spoke to someone at FOSDEM who may be interested in adopting this. I'll follow up later this week and if he's still on the fence, I'll ask rel-eng to not build this for F32 and we can easily revive it for F33 if there's an owner.
That sounds great. Thanks very much.
@lgmducazu is adopting this spin
Metadata Update from @bcotton: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
That's great!
@lgmducazu, please do let the team know how they can help. The ML is here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/scitech@lists.fedoraproject.org/
@lgmducazu aren't on pagure yet, and we've not heard from them on the sci-tech list yet either. I've e-mailed the ML and CC'd them. In the meantime, the maintainer is still marked as amitksaha so they're still being pinged for failing composes:
amitksaha
https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/1300
Ah, well, e-mails to @lgmducazu bounce, probably because they're not cla+1?
Added them to fedora-join FAS group temporarily to work around this, and resend the e-mail.
https://pagure.io/fedora-join/Fedora-Join/issue/201