#1339 missing acl's for some packages for epel7
Closed Opened by raveit65.

I want to have back acl's for epel7 for some of my packages. The only person who can grant that request is Dan Marchal (vicodan) but he is currently not reachable.

I've send him several emails the last 6 weeks but i didn't get an answer. I did cc those emails to rdieter and nirik. Last action from him was in May when he starts to build the mate stack for epel7. Last feedback from him was from 2014-08-10.

Hey Wolfgang, I am alive. I'm probably done with Fedora for a while, I just can't keep up with you! I'm moving to Philadelphia this week and just have way too much going on. I'll try catching up with you next week. Dan

After that i send him 3 mails but i didn't got an answer. The thing is that some packages need an update for epel7.

For all those packages i'm the owner and i did the review request. I wasn't agree with Dan to build those packages for epel7 in May, so i droped my priveleged for epel7, in result i can't grant my request for epel7 for myself now.

Ok, it would be nice if you could grant my open requests for following packages.

​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/pluma ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mozo ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mate-sensors-applet ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/marco ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/eom ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/caja-extensions ​https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/caja

Thank you

PS: Following the normal procedure for unresponsable maintainer is a bit exaggerated for the moment, imo , because it's too early for this, maybe Dan want's to come back.


I'm +1 for just granting the acls here.

Metadata