This is something I'd personally like too, but this is a request for Release Engineering, not us. Last I heard, there were technical limitations in our systems that prevented us from doing it, but you could ask them and find out.

Also note, all versions ever shipped are in our buildsystem, but I'm not sure if there's a straightforward way to access those builds for this scenario.

This is something I'd personally like too, but this is a request for Release Engineering, not us.

I'd be grateful if you helped me out and did everything properly. I'm completely new to pagure.io (only used bugzillas previously) and I don't want to be a source of spam here.

Is it possible to just move this issue over there?

Generally, if you have a proposal to do something differently, it's best to start here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ -- when a consensus is reached, you can ask around where to file tickets.

This here is a fesco issue tracker. We use it to vote about several processing issues, such as:

• https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/changes_policy/
• https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
• https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Sponsor_a_New_Contributor/#becoming_a_fedora_package_collection_sponsor
• resolving arguments when other means have clearly failed

When we vote about stuff, we sometimes discuss it here. However, this is not the Fedora's development discussion forum. This is a place for voting. The majority of Fedora contributors do not follow this issue tracker and as such, cannot participate in the discussion unless they are told about it.

Is it possible to just move this issue over there?

Not that I know of.

See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2678 for a previous ticket that asked for a more or less same thing.

@churchyard

Generally, if you have a proposal to do something differently, it's best to start here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ -- when a consensus is reached, you can ask around where to file tickets.

Considering the issue has been raised twice already, it's quite serious, mustn't be too difficult to implement and you know all the ins and outs, could you start a discussion over there by yourself please? Thank you!

Considering the issue has been raised twice already, it's quite serious

Being proposed twice does not make this serious.

mustn't be too difficult to implement

The short discussion in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2678 suggests it is quite difficult to implement.

and you know all the ins and outs

I don't.

could you start a discussion over there by yourself please? Thank you!

No. This is not how community involvement works.

OK, fine,

We don't have enough resources to have proper QA/QC and we are not interested in alleviating the issue of broken updates either some of which prevent the user from being able to use Fedora at all.

Good. Sorry for bothering you. Time and again everyone responsible for the Linux ecosystem proves how little they care about Linux becoming an OS usable by mere mortals. Have a good day.

This is the second time you've come here, made a request, and then insulted everybody when it didn't happen. This behavior is not welcome here.