I'm requesting to be added to the proven packager group. The primary reason is I frequently find myself helping package maintainers work issues that need fixes elsewhere and while I am able to help find the problem, I am blocked from fixing the issue at that point in time due to not being a provenpackager. That and I also mentor many newcomers to Fedora and would like the ability to help them with packages they are maintaining initially without becoming a full co-maintainer of those packages.
I believe everyone on FESCo knows me. I have been a package maintainer in Fedora since 2005 and have worked on many many different packages either as the sole maintainer, primary maintainer, or co-maintainer.
Announced to sponsors.
Sponsors, please vote in this ticket.
Metadata Update from @churchyard: - Issue tagged with: provenpackager
I thought he already was a provenpackager.
+1
I know you and being a FESCo member and a Council member certainly makes you "proven".
OTOH in many other cases, we have demanded that becoming a provenpackager requires a specific reason rather than a desire to help here and there. In the spirit of transparency, I'd like to understand better why you believe that being a provenpackager is necessary to fix some issues (examples would really help me with this understanding). The same curiosity applies to the ability to help your mentees - I'd imagine that offering your help in a form of a pull request and letting the mentee review it, ask questions, etc. might serve the need better than pushing your changes directly.
I am not saying your reasoning is invalid, I just like to be able to understand it better. Thanks.
+1 to this request.
I'm not sure where the 'specific reasons' thing has come from. (It's not in the policy). I know when we first setup provenpackagers there was a lot of 'lets make sure not to set the bar too high' discussion (which I couldn't find in a few minutes searching).
I also mentor many newcomers to Fedora
Do you have sponsor capabilities?
How come you are not already proven packager? +1!
The primary reason is I frequently find myself helping package maintainers work issues that need fixes elsewhere and while I am able to help find the problem, I am blocked from fixing the issue at that point in time due to not being a provenpackager. OTOH in many other cases, we have demanded that becoming a provenpackager requires a specific reason rather than a desire to help here and there.
The primary reason is I frequently find myself helping package maintainers work issues that need fixes elsewhere and while I am able to help find the problem, I am blocked from fixing the issue at that point in time due to not being a provenpackager.
OTOH in many other cases, we have demanded that becoming a provenpackager requires a specific reason rather than a desire to help here and there.
I don't recall that. We certainly require a reason. And even if we did require a specific reason, "helping package maintainers work issues that need fixes elsewhere" is specific-enough for me.
I also mentor many newcomers to Fedora Do you have sponsor capabilities?
Yes I do have that.
I frequently get this question.
Coming late to the party. :-)
Better late than never... +1.
Thats 7 days, and I see 20 +1s and 0 -1s, so this is approved. ;)
Use your powers wisely!
Metadata Update from @kevin: - Issue close_status updated to: Accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)