#3113 Nonresponsive maintainer: David Howells dhowells
Closed: Invalid by churchyard. Opened by bbhtt.

fas username: @dhowells
package: keyutils
issues to fix: See the devel mail for the details of why 1.6.3 is necessary. Also, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121553 was filed long before I started the process.
nonresponsive maintainer bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249374
fedora-devel mail: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/DLVU5YFNTMWZDMWA56L34KLZTPSA2BMF/
comainainers: N/A But preichl might be interested since they opened a PR to update it to 1.6.3
I am interested in comaintaining the package: No, I'm not a Fedora packager.
additional notes: The maintainer responded to the non-responsive maintainer bug but there has been no activity for a week after that. I asked if it was ok to continue the process and the answer was yes, hence this ticket.

This is a ticket for the Fedora's Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers.


Metadata Update from @ngompa:
- Issue tagged with: nonresponsive maintainer

@dhowells Are you still able to maintain keyutils? Would you mind adding @preichl as a co-maintainer?

Metadata Update from @churchyard:
- Issue assigned to dhowells

@dhowells ping

I would like to continue maintaining keyutils, but I have a lot of other things I'm also trying to do. I've no objection to adding @preichl as a co-maintainer.

@preichl Good with you?

@churchyard Hello, yes, of course, David is certainly the best person to maintain keyutils and as I became committer recently I can take the more mundane tasks of his back so David can focus on the more important stuff :-)

I see @preichl was actually already added. Thanks, everybody.

Metadata Update from @churchyard:
- Issue close_status updated to: Invalid
- Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

Metadata