This is probably what we should direct people to: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f<fedoraver>/

Yeah, that sounds good to me as well.

+1 on Neal's proposal

+1 from me too

+1

This is probably what we should direct people to: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f<fedoraver>/

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f42 does not exist.

Well, not yet, I think?

Well, not yet, I think?

I don't think we should be including anything in there that doesn't exist at Beta at the latest, personally. So if we want to use that format, can we get that created earlier? Right now we have f41 and rawhide, neither of which matches the Beta we've released.

Adding to the SOP to create it at branching is probably a good idea.

We should discuss this in the meeting - since it seems the straightforward solution does require changes to the SOP while the votes in favor were given before that was brought up

• AGREED: APPROVED (+9, 0, -0) Set DOCUMENTATION_URL to
  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/fNN/ This link SHOULD be
  available at the launch of GA, but if it's delayed, it does not block
  release. This link will be updated to the same document, but using a
  language-aware link once that becomes available (@salimma:fedora.im,
  18:29:24)
  • ACTION: sgallagh will update the DOCUMENTATION_URL in os-release
    (@salimma:fedora.im, 18:29:43)

This is now done and the relevant fedora-release packages for F41+ are in Bodhi.