libqtxdg and libfm-qt both have soname bumps as part of the larger LXQt-2.3.0 update.
These are internal dependencies only to the 2.3.0 update itself:
📦 mustang ~ % dnf rq --whatrequires libqtxdg --releasever=43 Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. liblxqt-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.i686 liblxqt-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 libqtxdg-devel-0:4.2.0-5.fc43.i686 libqtxdg-devel-0:4.2.0-5.fc43.x86_64 libqtxdg-devel-0:4.2.0-6.fc43.i686 libqtxdg-devel-0:4.2.0-6.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-about-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-config-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-notificationd-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-panel-0:2.2.2-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-panel-0:2.2.2-3.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-qtplugin-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.i686 lxqt-qtplugin-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-qtplugin-0:2.2.0-3.fc43.i686 lxqt-qtplugin-0:2.2.0-3.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-runner-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-session-0:2.2.0-5.fc43.x86_64 qtxdg-tools-0:4.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 screengrab-0:3.0.0-2.fc43.x86_64 screengrab-0:3.0.0-3.fc43.x86_64
and
📦 mustang ~ % dnf rq --whatrequires libfm-qt --releasever=43 Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. libfm-qt-devel-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.i686 libfm-qt-devel-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 libfm-qt-devel-0:2.2.0-3.fc43.i686 libfm-qt-devel-0:2.2.0-3.fc43.x86_64 libfm-qt-l10n-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.noarch libfm-qt-l10n-0:2.2.0-3.fc43.noarch lximage-qt-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 lxqt-archiver-0:1.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 pcmanfm-qt-0:2.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt-0:1.2.0-2.fc43.x86_64 xdg-desktop-portal-lxqt-0:1.2.0-4.fc43.x86_64
Metadata Update from @ngompa: - Issue tagged with: updates policy exception
I'm guessing this is because LXQt 2.3.0 released just now, right after the Fedora 43 GA?
It seems fine to me to do this, the LXQt desktop is pretty self contained and small. +1
This isn't the first time an LXQt related exception has been requested, is this something you foresee doing again in the future? If so, perhaps it's worth making a permanent exception, so we don't have to process these tickets on a regular basis when we know it's basically the same every time.
Correct. LXQt released their 2.3.0 update on 5 November 2025
These internal soname bumps are fairly common, everytime the LXQT project does one of it's major releases (Twice a year, IIRC)
It appears according to the website, they release in late April and early November generally. Weird, but unfortunately out of alignment with Fedora.
Do you foresee doing this again in the spring? If so, do you want us to consider a permanent exception?
Yes, please, I suspect that at a bare minimum, we will see the soname bump for these same two packages in April, so a Permanent Exception would be much appreciated
Proposal: The LXQt SIG is granted a permanent exception for the LXQt Desktop package set, though this does not obviate the requirement for exception requests involving packages not from the LXQt project.
+1 from me (as proposer)
+1
After a week, this is: APPROVED (+6, 0, 0) It'll be announced in today's agenda mail.
Metadata Update from @zbyszek: - Issue close_status updated to: Accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
This needs documenting.
Metadata Update from @ngompa: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed) - Issue tagged with: document it
https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-docs/pull-request/116
Merged.
Metadata Update from @zbyszek: - Issue untagged with: document it - Issue close_status updated to: Accepted - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)