@siosm I updated the tooling to add links to the Devel post, but there was no Devel post with the same title for this change request, so it was left off. I am thinking it should have a post there given the timeline on https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3591.

right now the devel list posts are moderated, so I process them when I get up... it should be there now.
I guess I can adjust it to not need moderation now.

-1 on this change for me. I think its a ton of wasted resources for little gain. I think other approaches should be tried.

If the folks working on this are willing to contribute resources to make it work, I think it's perfectly reasonable. Maybe we'll even get more builders out of this.

+1

FYI, just so they're notified: @lleyton, @kylegospo, @owensz

So if I understand correctly, this would build everything for both arch levels, which would indeed be a massive amount of storage and build time.

We would also have to provide -v3 container/bootc/rpm-ostree images alongside the current ones.

I'm conflicted. This would be really nice but the amount of work would be significant.

Maybe a proposal that also takes into account the problems we have with i686 support (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_support) would be easier to accept.

I'm conflicted. This would be really nice but the amount of work would be significant.

The amount of technical work to enable it isn't significant unless we're only selectively building stuff. Building everything is easy, building only some things is hard.

At today's FESCo meeting, it was decided that the Change proposers will perform some performance comparisons as well and impact analysis and will come back to FESCo with additional data in about three weeks.