This ticket was opened by error, we have now correctly identified user activity on Bugzilla. Sorry for the noise.

Dear Ben,

Thank you for reaching out. I think keeping track of people like this is a
great initiative. I am still interested in participating in Fedora and
believe I should remain a member of the Packagers group. It's true that at
the moment, I am only a solo maintainer for one package,
golang-github-msprev-fzf-bibtex, and this package is quite stable. However,
I am still taking care of it. In addition to using the package every day
for work, I also subscribe to and read all the Github issues, and as soon
as a new version is pushed, I have uploaded it. It's true that now there
hasn't been an upstream update in more than a year, but I still feel that I
am an active maintainer of this package.

Your email does remind me that there is more that I can do for Fedora, and
I intend to look around in the coming months for other tools I use which
need more assistance with package maintenance.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Best,
Daniel

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 3:21 PM Ben Cotton pagure@pagure.io wrote:

bcotton reported a new issue against the project:
find-inactive-packagers that you are following:
``
Hello @dmoerner,

during our periodic check as per the "Inactive packagers policy"
we detected no activity from you as a packager, nor in
other Fedora community places, like Bodhi or mailing lists.

In order to reduce security risks from possible accounts hijacking
we're trying to contact you to know if you're still reachable and
if your email set in Fedora Account System (dmo*@gmail.com) is still
valid.

Please, let us know if you're still intersted in participating
in Fedora and if you still need your account to be listed in the
packager group.

Without any reply from you, in two months we will proceed to remove
your account from the packager group. Your account will still be active.

``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/774