koji

#1403 [RFE] utils/kojid in PyPi
Closed: Fixed by tkopecek. Opened by tkopecek.

Closed: Fixed
Reopen Issue

I've got this request - to distribute also utils via PyPi. From my POV it is almost the same as publishing kojid there. I'm not sure how to deal with this. Implicitly I'm against, as these "binaries" are dependent on global configs by default. On the other hand, they all can be fed with custom config paths, etc. So in the end I've no strong argument against.

What do you think? Is it useful to have these in PyPi?

Metadata Update from @mikem:
- Issue priority set to: Low (was: Normal)

Pending @tkopecek help add Estimation and Acceptance Criteria
Edited by yulwang

Metadata Update from @yulwang:
- Issue tagged with: groomed

I would only add koji-gc/kojira/koji-shadow to distribution: #1428

Metadata Update from @tkopecek:
- Issue set to the milestone: 1.18

Metadata Update from @tkopecek:
- Issue untagged with: discussion

Metadata Update from @dgregor:
- Custom field Size adjusted to None
- Issue set to the milestone: None (was: 1.18)

Would like to have further discussion around the plans for PyPi. Let's not tie this to the 1.18 release.

Metadata Update from @dgregor:
- Issue set to the milestone: 1.20

@dgregor - So, do we want to have these in PyPi? It probably extends to "have all runnables in PyPi" (even kojid).

Commit 5c1c25db fixes this issue

Commit f114816b fixes this issue

Metadata Update from @jcupova:
- Issue tagged with: testing-done

This issue has been migrated to Fedora Forge:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/koji/koji/issues/1403

Please continue any further discussion there.
Metadata
None

feature groomed testing-done

None
None
Normal
None
Related Pull Requests
Static archive. pagure.io was sunset in 2026; this is a read-only snapshot.
Red Hat Logo

Fedora is sponsored by Red Hat. Learn more about the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora »

© Red Hat, Inc. and others.