Some packages changed significantly in their lifetime. It is distorted value to use simple average. Would it make sense to add an option to use sliding window? It could be limited a) by time (e.g. one year) or probably better b) last ~100 builds of same package?
@ktdreyer also mentioned, that there could be differences due to target. But it is adding more complexity (now we have just one simple query here)
Metadata Update from @tkopecek: - Custom field Size adjusted to None
Metadata Update from @tkopecek: - Issue tagged with: scheduler
This issue has been migrated to Fedora Forge: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/koji/koji/issues/1494
Please continue any further discussion there.