Fix issue: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/756 1) Force coverage3 read .coveragerc3 as rc file to generate report and html 2) Add exclude_lines and extend checks in both .coveragerc and .coveragerc3
1 new commit added
:thumbsup:
Looks good. Is "no cover 3.x" standard? Is there any sort of standard for such conditional exclusions?
@mikem The 'no cover 3.x' is an extended keyword that I defined it in .coveragerc3. I also defined 'no cover 2.x' for python2 to separate different conditions.
For exclude_lines details, please refer to: https://coverage.readthedocs.io/en/coverage-4.4.2/excluding.html
Commit dc411d94 fixes this pull-request
Pull-Request has been merged by mikem
Fix issue: https://pagure.io/koji/issue/756
1) Force coverage3 read .coveragerc3 as rc file to generate report and html
2) Add exclude_lines and extend checks in both .coveragerc and .coveragerc3