Issue #386: /etc/shells need to be considered - packaging-committee

packaging-committee

#386 /etc/shells need to be considered

Closed: Fixed Opened Jan 20, 2014 by cicku.

Hi all,

I made[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Cicku/Drafts/Take_account_of_shells_file this draft] since prior to this a bug was found by myself in 'tmux' package:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972633

Hence I'd like to hear your opinions.

Thanks.

spot commented Jan 24, 2014

Draft + requirement for all binary shell paths to be handled with /etc/shells scriptlets approved (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0). abadger1999 to fixup draft.

toshio commented Feb 20, 2014

Draft updated:

https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User%3ACicku%2FDrafts%2FTake_account_of_shells_file&diff=370369&oldid=368056

toshio commented Feb 20, 2014

Added to the ScriptletSnippets page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shells

Announcement text:

"""

New guidelines have been added that address modifying the /etc/shells file when a package adds a new login shell: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shells

"""

Metadata Update from @toshio:
- Issue assigned to spot

Feb 17, 2017

Metadata

Assignee

spot

Tags

None

Blocking

None

Depending on

None

Priority

None

packaging-committee

#386 /etc/shells need to be considered Closed: Fixed Opened Jan 20, 2014 by cicku.

Metadata

#386 /etc/shells need to be considered

Closed: Fixed Opened Jan 20, 2014 by cicku.