Note that it might be confusing if people want to access sources by their variables, because those are still numbered.

This sentence suggests to write "%gem_install -n %{SOURCE0}". You're changing that to "%gem_install -n Source". That won't work, will it?

No, it won't.

I wonder why you replace Patch0 / %patch0 with Patch1 / %patch1 here? Doing the same thing for patches as four sources should make this "Patch" and %patch0, right?

Both changes were an oversight. Removed.

@decathorpe I want to avoid examples combining Patch: and %patch0 -- if you need to reference a patch by its number, better hardcode that number.

I'm not seeing any reason not to merge this at this point, though it's still tagged meeting and I don't recall how much discussion there was.

Untagged, rebased.

This doesn't make sense when other sources are numbered.

This doesn't make sense when other sources are numbered.

I don't necessarily agree, but if this is the only blocker, I can revert that bit.

@ngompa Removed.