#1311 Add an evidence for font package naming
Merged by james. Opened by tagoh.
tagoh/packaging-committee font-naming  into  master

Download 1311.patch

There was some evidence how we should follow for the font package naming
but it was dropped by 20983f3643f60e4c9ac769bc11189491042aae4a and
the reference became a dead link since then.
This isn't good thing because we are missing the reason why fonts-rpm-macros
behave like that. We still need an evidence in our policy.

Commit 788b0cdc fixes this pull-request

Pull-Request has been merged by james

Pull-Request has been merged by james

Metadata