It would be good if you would use asciidoc syntax instead of dumping wiki one :)

Also please use semantic breaks (sembr.org)

And you need to add your page to navigation bar. You can create submenu for crypto things if you feel that it makes sense

Where are these pages generated?

Updated

btw. the review interface is not ready for semantic spacing.

Where are these pages generated?

Depends what you need. You can read README to find out how to generate website.

btw. the review interface is not ready for semantic spacing.

it is simply text file, so just split it.

Where are these pages generated?
Depends what you need. You can read README to find out how to generate website.

My question is on where to refer people to see that policy. I can see the wiki policies.

Ah, it will be here -- https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/

Thank you. Any other issues to be addressed?

Yes, please make it actually to use proper syntax for documentation. Like the first title and header should be in = Some Header format. See index.adoc or other documents for example of formatting.

Updated

Hi, Igor, they seem to be addressed. Anything I may have missed?

The problem is that there isn't a corresponding issue, so this doesn't show up in ticket reports and thus doesn't get on the meeting agenda.

I've clarified that we still need an open issue for discussion in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee

I'm not familiar with the context, but isn't #665 a corresponding open issue?

Guys, what do I need to do to unblock this issue?

We will discuss it today on a meeting.

I think this should say "packagers who maintain packages".

Alternatively, instead of "packagers who maintain packages" just say "maintainers of packages"

s/which/who/

Should "p11tool" be on fixed-width font?

+1

Thanks, nice comments. Updated.

s/maintains/maintainers/

done

The same text is still in the other file, SSLCertificateHandling.adoc

done

Looks good to me now, thanks!

I merged this manually.