There are cases, where users experience issues when trying to update system including -debuginfo packages:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZHJUHPQMZ4PH7WMQFPNYKXQ2OM4VODXB/ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4PMKPOOWEZR7EWJCQ6XHLPQ6IKIHQPJ7/#4PMKPOOWEZR7EWJCQ6XHLPQ6IKIHQPJ7
Because developer experience this issue just rarely, there is not real knowledge how to handle this situation. It seems the consensus is just to ignore the issue, however not every package follows the consensus:
$ grep -R Obsoletes | grep debuginfo dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: lcgdm-dav-debuginfo < %{version}-%{release} dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: dmlite-plugins-adapter-debuginfo < 0.7.0-1 dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: dmlite-plugins-mysql-debuginfo < 0.7.0-1 dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: dmlite-plugins-memcache-debuginfo < 0.7.0-1 dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: dmlite-plugins-profiler-debuginfo < 0.7.0-1 dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: dmlite-plugins-librarian-debuginfo < 0.7.0-1 dmlite.spec:Obsoletes: dmlite-shell-debuginfo < 0.7.0-1 fts.spec:Obsoletes: fts-mysql-debuginfo < %{version} glibc.spec:Obsoletes: glibc-debuginfo-common pcp.spec:Obsoletes: pcp-webapi-debuginfo < 5.0.0 pcp.spec:Obsoletes: pcp-gui-debuginfo < 4.1.1 pcp.spec:Obsoletes: pcp-pmda-papi-debuginfo < 5.0.0 pcp.spec:Obsoletes: pcp-pmda-lmsensors-debuginfo < 4.2.0 pcp.spec:- Remove Obsoletes line for pcp-gui-debuginfo libdnf.spec:Obsoletes: python2-hawkey-debuginfo < %{version}-%{release} libdnf.spec:Obsoletes: python2-libdnf-debuginfo < %{version}-%{release}
This is clumsy attempt to clarify what to do in such situation from developer POV.
Of course, other possibility would be to solve this somehow. @mjw thoughts?
+1 to not obsolete them
+1
Metadata Update from @ignatenkobrain: - Pull-request tagged with: meeting
We talked about this in this weeks meeting (https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-07-23/fpc.2020-07-23-16.01.txt):
Commit d3da019c fixes this pull-request
Pull-Request has been merged by james
Thx :thumbsup:
This should be announced, right? IOW the tags should be updated I think.
There are cases, where users experience issues when trying to update system including -debuginfo packages:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZHJUHPQMZ4PH7WMQFPNYKXQ2OM4VODXB/
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4PMKPOOWEZR7EWJCQ6XHLPQ6IKIHQPJ7/#4PMKPOOWEZR7EWJCQ6XHLPQ6IKIHQPJ7
Because developer experience this issue just rarely, there is not real knowledge how to handle this situation. It seems the consensus is just to ignore the issue, however not every package follows the consensus:
This is clumsy attempt to clarify what to do in such situation from developer POV.
Of course, other possibility would be to solve this somehow. @mjw thoughts?