Is there any specific information you would like or just a list of files and folders (so the equivalent to https://pagure.io/pagure/blob/master/f/pagure in JSON)?

Yes, that would be nice. (To be able to search through files without the need to clone a repo.)

Some relevant links:

• github api: https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/contents
• pygithub: https://pygithub.readthedocs.io/en/latest/github_objects/Repository.html#github.Repository.Repository.get_contents

• our implementation: https://github.com/packit-service/ogr/blob/cddce51904617c18565effa1d1955f69486ba745/ogr/services/github/project.py#L405

• gitlab: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/repositories.html#list-repository-tree

• python-gitlab: https://python-gitlab.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/gitlab.v4.html#gitlab.v4.objects.Project.repository_tree
• our implementation: https://github.com/packit-service/ogr/blob/cddce51904617c18565effa1d1955f69486ba745/ogr/services/gitlab/project.py#L344

Thanks!

Something like this:

• directory:

{
    "type": "dir",
    "name": "dir1",
    "content": [
        {
            "type": "file",
            "name": "file1.txt",
            "content_url": "https:/....f/raw/file1.txt}"
        },
        {
            "type": "file",
            "name": "file2.txt",
            "content_url": "https:/....f/raw/file2.txt}"
        }
    ]
}

• file:

{"type": "file", "name": "file1.txt", "content_url": "https:/....f/raw/file1.txt}"}

And ideally for any git-ref (e.g. branch, tag, commit).

Maybe it makes sense to set the level of recursion. And allow getting the whole tree with levels=-1.

I have the basic code for this which use the structure you've used (except that it uses file and folder where you used file and dir :))

I have not implemented the recursion as I am a bit wondering if there is a risk of DOS with it.

Do you really need it?

I have the basic code for this which use the structure you've used (except that it uses file and folder where you used file and dir :))

Thank you so much!

I have not implemented the recursion as I am a bit wondering if there is a risk of DOS with it.

Do you really need it?

The solution without recursion is fine for start and we can still be able to load the other levels with another call. (=> We can implement it on our side.)

I'll create a new issue if we find that necessary.

Thanks!

Commit dd207ee3 fixes this issue

Thank you so much!

Do you know in which version it is going? (Just to know when we can start working on it.)

Do you know in which version it is going? (Just to know when we can start working on it.)

Sorry, I see now the 5.11 milestone.