GNOME Activity Journal v1.0.0 is completely ported to GTK3 and Python3. Hence, the package needs to be unretired.
More details:
Package name : gnome-activity-journal Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : crvi crvisqr@gmail.com URL : https://gitlab.gnome.org/crvi/gnome-activity-journal License : GPL v3 Programming Lang: Python3 Description : Activity Journal for the GNOME desktop environment ( Powered by Zeitgeist 1.0.3 )
Package description:
GNOME Activity Journal is a tool for easily browsing and finding files that you worked on. It uses Zeitgeist to get information and metadata on what files you have accessed. It also keeps a chronological journal of all file activity and supports tagging and establishing relationships between groups of files.
Why is this package useful/relevant?
It tracks file usage history and previewing.
Latest screenshots of version 1.0.0:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/GitLab/-/issues/466
Detailed discussion on GNOME discourse:
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/zeitgeist-gnome-activity-journal-1-0/4521
N/A
Thanks, crvi
Hi, the package was retired more than a year ago. According to fedora guidelines you need to create a re-review Once the review is approved please reopen this issue.
Metadata Update from @humaton: - Issue close_status updated to: Get back later - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938522
Review is approved.
Metadata Update from @crvi: - Issue status updated to: Open (was: Closed)
Hi @crvi, thanks for taking the package. There is one thing, you are not in the packager group. I can make you the maintainer of the repository but you will not be able to push or build any package. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
I can make you the maintainer of the repository
Please don't make non-packagers maintainers of package repositories. It breaks things.
I can make you the maintainer of the repository Please don't make non-packagers maintainers of package repositories. It breaks things.
Sorry for the bad wording, I won't do that. Until the requester gets sponsored.
Thanks!
@humaton : I am now part of the "Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group".
@humaton: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33219 is blocked on this issue, I guess.
@crvi please don't request a new repository for an existing repository. It will just fail. The package is now unretired, for missing branches please use fedpkg request-branch
fedpkg request-branch
Metadata Update from @humaton: - Issue close_status updated to: Fixed - Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)
@humaton: Thanks and sorry for the confusion.